Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16546
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDaniels, Christopher P-
dc.contributor.authorMillar, Jeremy L-
dc.contributor.authorSpelman, Tim-
dc.contributor.authorSengupta, Shomik-
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Sue M-
dc.date2015-11-09-
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T05:55:12Z-
dc.date.available2017-01-30T05:55:12Z-
dc.date.issued2016-04-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology 2016; 60(2): 247-254en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16546-
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Long-term data from three randomized trials have demonstrated that adjuvant radiation therapy (ART) reduces the rate of biochemical failure in high-risk men following radical prostatectomy (RP). One of these trials has shown a survival advantage. We investigated the rate of ART in Victoria and the predictors for this treatment. METHODS: We analysed data from eligible patients who were notified to the Victorian Prostate Cancer Registry (PCR) by 37 Victorian hospitals between 1 August 2008 and 31 October 2011. We defined ART as radiation therapy (RT) delivered within 6 months of RP. Predictors of ART receipt were modelled using adjusted and unadjusted logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 4626 eligible cases from which 2018 underwent RP with recorded date of surgery. Of these eligible prostatectomy cases, a total of 89 received ART. A subgroup of 833 men had an adverse pathologic feature, of whom 78 received ART. In a multivariate model, pathologic tumour stage pT3a (odds ratio (OR) 2.64; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-5.00; P = 0.003), pT3b (OR 4.58; 95% CI 2.12-9.89; P = 0.000), a positive surgical margin (OR 8.91; 95% CI 4.61-17.2; P = 0.000) and pathologic Gleason grade >7 (OR 7.18; 95% CI 1.54-33.6; P = 0.012) predicted receipt of ART. CONCLUSION: Adverse pathologic features and high pathologic Gleason score predict for receiving ART in Victorian men after RP, but overall, ART is not commonly prescribed. This finding is consistent with other published series and may reflect clinician scepticism regarding the benefit of ART over salvage RT and concern about toxicity and the risk of over treatment.en_US
dc.subjectGleason scoreen_US
dc.subjectAdjuvanten_US
dc.subjectProstatectomyen_US
dc.subjectProstatic neoplasmsen_US
dc.subjectRadiotherapyen_US
dc.titlePredictors and rate of adjuvant radiation therapy following radical prostatectomy: a report from the Prostate Cancer Registryen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncologyen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationCentre for Population Health, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26548940en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1754-9485.12407en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen_US
local.name.researcherSengupta, Shomik
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.deptUrology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

20
checked on Nov 15, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.