Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16360
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorToussaint, Michel-
dc.contributor.authorPernet, Kurt-
dc.contributor.authorSteens, Marc-
dc.contributor.authorHaan, Jurn-
dc.contributor.authorSheers, Nicole-
dc.date2015-10-06-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-17T00:20:26Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-17T00:20:26Z-
dc.date.issued2016-01-
dc.identifier.citationRespiratory Care 2016; 61(1): 61-67en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16360-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Air stacking improves cough effectiveness in people with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and respiratory muscle weakness. However, it is not known whether air stacking is more effective via a resuscitator bag or a home ventilator. METHODS: This prospective randomized study investigated the effect of air stacking via a volume-cycled home ventilator versus via a resuscitator bag in participants with DMD. Maximum insufflation capacity and peak expiratory flow during spontaneous (cough peak flow) and air stacking-assisted cough maneuvers (air stacking-assisted cough peak flow) were measured. RESULTS: Fifty-two adult DMD subjects receiving noninvasive ventilation were included in the study: 27 participants performed air stacking via their home ventilator (home-ventilator group; age = 25.3 ± 5.1 y; forced vital capacity (FVC) = 809 ± 555 mL), and 25 participants used a resuscitator bag (resuscitator-bag group; age = 24.7 ± 5.7 y, FVC = 807 ± 495 mL). Following a single training session, air stacking could be performed successfully by 89% (home ventilator) and 88% (resuscitator bag) of participants. There were comparable maximum insufflation capacities (1,481 mL for the home-ventilator group vs 1,344 mL for the resuscitator-bag group, P = .33) and mean air stacking-assisted cough peak flow values (199 L/min for the home-ventilator group vs 186 L/min for the resuscitator-bag group, P = .33) between techniques. Air stacking-assisted cough peak flow increased significantly compared with baseline in both groups (mean increase: +51% [home ventilator] vs +49% [resuscitator bag], P < .001), with individual air stacking-assisted cough peak flow improvements ranging from -20 to 245%. CONCLUSIONS: Cough augmentation is an important component of the respiratory management of people with a neuromuscular disorder. No difference in cough effectiveness as measured by air stacking-assisted cough peak flow was found in air stacking via a ventilator compared with via a resuscitator bag. Both methods achieved mean air stacking-assisted cough peak flow values of >160 L/min. Provision of an inexpensive resuscitator bag can effectively improve cough capacity, and it is simple to use, which may improve access to respiratory care in people with DMD.en_US
dc.subjectDuchenne muscular dystrophyen_US
dc.subjectAir stackingen_US
dc.subjectAirway clearanceen_US
dc.subjectChest physiotherapyen_US
dc.subjectCoughen_US
dc.titleCough augmentation in subjects with duchenne muscular dystrophy: comparison of air stacking via a resuscitator bag versus mechanical ventilationen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleRespiratory Careen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationZiekenhuis Inkendaal, Vlezenbeek, Belgiumen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationVictorian Respiratory Support Service, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationInstitute for Breathing and Sleep, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26443018en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4187/respcare.04033en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen_US
local.name.researcherSheers, Nicole
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptInstitute for Breathing and Sleep-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

38
checked on Nov 19, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.