Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16345
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHolland, Anne E-
dc.contributor.authorMahal, Ajay-
dc.contributor.authorHill, Catherine J-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Annemarie L-
dc.contributor.authorBurge, Angela T-
dc.contributor.authorCox, Narelle S-
dc.contributor.authorMoore, Rosemary P-
dc.contributor.authorNicolson, Caroline-
dc.contributor.authorO'Halloran, Paul-
dc.contributor.authorLahham, Aroub-
dc.contributor.authorGillies, Rebecca-
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, Christine F-
dc.date2016-09-26-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-14T00:51:56Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-14T00:51:56Z-
dc.date.issued2017-01-
dc.identifier.citationThorax 2017; 72(1): 57-65en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16345-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Pulmonary rehabilitation is a cornerstone of care for COPD but uptake of traditional centre-based programmes is poor. We assessed whether home-based pulmonary rehabilitation, delivered using minimal resources, had equivalent outcomes to centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation. METHODS: A randomised controlled equivalence trial with 12 months follow-up. Participants with stable COPD were randomly assigned to receive 8 weeks of pulmonary rehabilitation by either the standard outpatient centre-based model, or a new home-based model including one home visit and seven once-weekly telephone calls from a physiotherapist. The primary outcome was change in 6 min walk distance (6MWD). RESULTS: We enrolled 166 participants to receive centre-based rehabilitation (n=86) or home-based rehabilitation (n=80). Intention-to-treat analysis confirmed non-inferiority of home-based rehabilitation for 6MWD at end-rehabilitation and the confidence interval (CI) did not rule out superiority (mean difference favouring home group 18.6 m, 95% CI -3.3 to 40.7). At 12 months the CI did not exclude inferiority (-5.1 m, -29.2 to 18.9). Between-group differences for dyspnoea-related quality of life did not rule out superiority of home-based rehabilitation at programme completion (1.6 points, -0.3 to 3.5) and groups were equivalent at 12 months (0.05 points, -2.0 to 2.1). The per-protocol analysis showed the same pattern of findings. Neither group maintained postrehabilitation gains at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: This home-based pulmonary rehabilitation model, delivered with minimal resources, produced short-term clinical outcomes that were equivalent to centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation. Neither model was effective in maintaining gains at 12 months. Home-based pulmonary rehabilitation could be considered for people with COPD who cannot access centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01423227, clinicaltrials.gov.en_US
dc.subjectPulmonary Rehabilitationen_US
dc.titleHome-based rehabilitation for COPD using minimal resources: a randomised, controlled equivalence trialen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleThoraxen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAustin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDiscipline of Physiotherapy, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Physiotherapy, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationInstitute for Breathing and Sleep, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Nossal Institute for Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Physiotherapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27672116en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208514en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen_US
local.name.researcherBurge, Angela T
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
crisitem.author.deptInstitute for Breathing and Sleep-
crisitem.author.deptPhysiotherapy-
crisitem.author.deptInstitute for Breathing and Sleep-
crisitem.author.deptPhysiotherapy-
crisitem.author.deptInstitute for Breathing and Sleep-
crisitem.author.deptInstitute for Breathing and Sleep-
crisitem.author.deptInstitute for Breathing and Sleep-
crisitem.author.deptInstitute for Breathing and Sleep-
crisitem.author.deptRespiratory and Sleep Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

48
checked on Dec 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.