Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16326
Title: Prevalence of ketosis, ketonuria, and ketoacidosis during liberal glycemic control in critically ill patients with diabetes: an observational study
Austin Authors: Luethi, Nora;Cioccari, Luca;Crisman, Marco;Bellomo, Rinaldo ;Eastwood, Glenn M ;Mårtensson, Johan
Affiliation: Department of Intensive Care, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland
Department of Perioperative Medicine, Intensive Care and Emergency, Cattinara Hospital, Trieste University School of Medicine, Trieste, Italy
Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC), Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Issue Date: 15-Sep-2016
Date: 2016-09-15
Publication information: Critical Care 2016; 20: 297
Abstract: BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether liberal glucose control in critically ill diabetic patients leads to increased ketone production and ketoacidosis. Therefore, we aimed to assess the prevalence of ketosis, ketonuria and ketoacidosis in critically ill diabetic patients treated in accordance with a liberal glycemic control protocol. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational cohort study of 60 critically ill diabetic patients with blood and/or urine ketone bodies tested in ICU. All patients were treated according to a liberal glucose protocol targeting a blood glucose level (BGL) between 10 and 14 mmol/l in a single tertiary intensive care unit in Australia. We measured quantitative bedside blood 3-beta-hydroxybutyrate (β-OHB) and semi-quantitative urine ketones on ICU admission and daily during ICU stay, for a maximum of 10 consecutive days. RESULTS: Median blood β-OHB level on admission was 0.3 (0.1, 0.8) mmol/l. Ketoacidosis was rare (3 %), but some level of ketosis (β-OHB ≥0.6 mmol/l) was found in 38 patients (63 %) early during their ICU stay. However, there was no significant difference in prevalence or severity of ketonemia and ketonuria among patients with BGL above (permissive hyperglycemia) or below 10 mmol/l. On multivariable linear regression analysis there was no association between blood ketone levels and BGL, HbA1c, lactate levels, hematocrit, catecholamine infusion or APACHE III score. In contrast, blood ketone levels tended to be higher after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Liberal glycemic control in critically ill diabetic patients does not appear to be associated with a high prevalence of ketoacidosis or ketonemia. Moreover, ketosis is typically present on admission and resolves rapidly. Finally, cardiopulmonary bypass surgery may be an important trigger of ketone body production. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12615000216516 ; trial registration date 5 March 2015).
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16326
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-016-1462-7
ORCID: 0000-0002-1650-8939
Journal: Critical Care
PubMed URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27633987
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Critical illness
Diabetes mellitus
Ketone bodies
Hyperglycemia
Adults
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

46
checked on Apr 27, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.