Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16298
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHoag, Nathan-
dc.contributor.authorPlagakis, Sophie-
dc.contributor.authorPillay, Samantha-
dc.contributor.authorEdwards, Alisa Wilson-
dc.contributor.authorGani, Johan-
dc.date2016-09-09-
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-29T02:32:44Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-29T02:32:44Z-
dc.date.issued2016-09-09-
dc.identifier.citationNeurourology and Urodynamics 2017; 36(5): 1377-1381en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16298-
dc.description.abstractAIMS: Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is a well-established treatment modality for refractory overactive bladder (OAB). There is a paucity of evidence examining the use of SNM in patients who have received prior intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA (BTXA) treatment. We aim to review those patients who underwent SNM for refractory OAB following treatment with BTXA. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted to identify patients who had undergone prior intradetrusor BTXA for refractory OAB, then subsequent first-stage SNM. Patient demographics, number/dosage of BTXA, voiding diaries, and patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I) scores were recorded. Successful first-stage SNM was defined as subjective patient improvement of greater than 50%. Patient satisfaction and device use at last follow-up was noted. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were identified having undergone SNM for OAB, of which 36 had prior BTXA treatment and were included in the series. 23/36 (63.9%) of patients had successful first-stage SNM, and underwent insertion of implantable pulse generator, compared to 33/47 (70.2%) in those who had never been treated with BTXA (Pā€‰=ā€‰0.5). Mean PGI-I score was 2.6 (range 1-4). With a mean follow up of 29.1 months (range 12-53), 17/23 (73.9%) were satisfied, and using the device at last follow-up. CONCLUSION: SNM is a suitable treatment option in those patients who have had prior BTXA treatment for refractory OAB, even in those for whom BTXA proved ineffective. Success rates were within the published range, and comparable to our own results, for SNM in OAB patients without prior BTXA treatment.en_US
dc.subjectBotulinum toxin Aen_US
dc.subjectOveractive bladderen_US
dc.subjectSacral neuromodulationen_US
dc.subjectUrgency urinary incontinenceen_US
dc.titleSacral neuromodulation for refractory overactive bladder after prior intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA treatmenten_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleNeurourology and Urodynamicsen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAustin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationRepatriation General Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationContinence Matters, Adelaide, South Australia, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27612039en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/nau.23117en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen_US
local.name.researcherGani, Johan
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptUrology-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery (University of Melbourne)-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

20
checked on Oct 2, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.