Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16263
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMyles, Paul S-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Matthew TV-
dc.contributor.authorKasza, Jessica-
dc.contributor.authorPaech, Michael J-
dc.contributor.authorLeslie, Kate-
dc.contributor.authorPeyton, Philip J-
dc.contributor.authorSessler, Daniel I-
dc.contributor.authorHaller, Guy-
dc.contributor.authorBeattie, W Scott-
dc.contributor.authorOsborne, Cameron-
dc.contributor.authorSneyd, J Robert-
dc.contributor.authorForbes, Andrew-
dc.date2016-05-
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-14T04:40:19Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-14T04:40:19Z-
dc.date.issued2016-05-
dc.identifier.citationAnesthesiology 2016; 124(5): 1032-1040en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16263-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The Evaluation of Nitrous oxide in the Gas Mixture for Anesthesia II trial randomly assigned 7,112 noncardiac surgery patients to a nitrous oxide or nitrous oxide-free anesthetic; severe postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was a prespecified secondary end point. Thus, the authors evaluated the association between nitrous oxide, severe PONV, and effectiveness of PONV prophylaxis in this setting. METHODS: Univariate and multivariate analyses of patient, surgical, and other perioperative characteristics were used to identify the risk factors for severe PONV and to measure the impact of severe PONV on patient outcomes. RESULTS: Avoiding nitrous oxide reduced the risk of severe PONV (11 vs. 15%; risk ratio [RR], 0.74 [95% CI, 0.63 to 0.84]; P < 0.001), with a stronger effect in Asian patients (RR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.43 to 0.69]; interaction P = 0.004) but lower effect in those who received PONV prophylaxis (RR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.76 to 1.05]; P = 0.18). Gastrointestinal surgery was associated with an increased risk of severe PONV when compared with most other types of surgery (P < 0.001). Patients with severe PONV had lower quality of recovery scores (10.4 [95% CI, 10.2 to 10.7] vs. 13.1 [95% CI, 13.0 to 13.2], P < 0.0005); severe PONV was associated with postoperative fever (15 vs. 20%, P = 0.001). Patients with severe PONV had a longer hospital stay (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.05 to 1.23], P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The increased risk of PONV with nitrous oxide is near eliminated by antiemetic prophylaxis. Severe PONV, which is seen in more than 10% of patients, is associated with postoperative fever, poor quality of recovery, and prolonged hospitalization.en_US
dc.subjectPostoperative Nausea and Vomitingen_US
dc.subjectNitrous Oxideen_US
dc.subjectAnesthesia, Inhalationen_US
dc.titleSevere nausea and vomiting in the evaluation of nitrous oxide in the gas mixture for anesthesia II trialen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleAnesthesiologyen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAustin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Alfred Hospital, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong, People's Republic of Chinaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Medicine and Pharmacology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAnaesthesia, Perioperative and Pain Medicine Unit, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, Austin Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationInstitute for Breathing and Sleep, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Outcomes Research, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USAen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pharmacology, Geneva University Hospitals, University of Geneva, Switzerlanden_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Management, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canadaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Anesthesia, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canadaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Anesthesia, Perioperative and Acute Pain Management, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationPlymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, UKen_US
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26904965en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/ALN.0000000000001057en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen_US
local.name.researcherPeyton, Philip J
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptAnaesthesia-
crisitem.author.deptInstitute for Breathing and Sleep-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

42
checked on Oct 4, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.