Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16220
Title: Prioritizing interventions to manage polypharmacy in Australian aged care facilities.
Austin Authors: Jokanovic, Natali;Wang, Kate N;Dooley, Michael J;Lalic, Samanta;Tan, Edwin CK;Kirkpatrick, Carl M;Bell, J Simon
Affiliation: Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Pharmacy Department, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Pharmacy Department, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Sansom Institute, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
Issue Date: May-2017
Date: 2016-06-14
Publication information: Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy 2017; 13(3): 564-574
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy is highly prevalent in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). Although polypharmacy is sometimes unavoidable, polypharmacy has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: To identify and prioritize a range of potential interventions to manage polypharmacy in RACFs from the perspectives of health care professionals, health policy and consumer representatives. METHODS: Two nominal group technique (NGT) sessions were convened in August 2015. A purposive sample (n = 19) of clinicians, researchers, managers and representatives of consumer, professional and health policy organizations were asked to nominate interventions to address the prevalence and appropriateness of medication use. Participants were then asked to prioritize five interventions suitable for possible implementation at the system level. RESULTS: Six of 16 potential interventions were prioritized highest for possible implementation in clinical practice, with two interventions prioritized as second highest. The top interventions in rank order were 'implementation of a pharmacist-led medication reconciliation service for new residents,' 'conduct facility-level audits and feedback to staff and health care professionals,' 'develop deprescribing scripts to assist clinician-resident discussion,' 'develop or revise prescribing guidelines specific to older people with multimorbidity in RACFs,' 'implement electronic medication charts and records' and 'better support Medication Advisory Committees (MACs) to address medication appropriateness.' CONCLUSION: This study prioritized a range of potential interventions that may be used to assist clinicians and policy makers develop a comprehensive strategy to manage polypharmacy in RACFs.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16220
DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.06.003
Journal: Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
PubMed URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27374998
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Deprescribing
Long-term care
Nominal group technique
Nursing homes
Polypharmacy
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

22
checked on Dec 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.