Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16183
Title: Medical resource utilization and costs among Australian patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C: results of a retrospective observational study
Austin Authors: McElroy, Heather J;Roberts, Stuart K;Thompson, Alex J;Angus, Peter W ;McKenna, Sarah Jane;Warren, Emma;Musgrave, Sharon
Affiliation: Austin Health
Covance (Asia) Pte Ltd, Singapore
The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
St Vincent's Hospital and the University of Melbourne, Melbourne , Victoria, Australia
Covance Pty Ltd, Sydney, NSW, Australia
HERA Consulting, Sydney, NSW, Australia
AbbVie Pty Ltd, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Issue Date: 23-Aug-2016
Date: 2016-08-23
Publication information: Journal of Medical Economics 2016; online first: 26 August
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate medical resource utilization (MRU) and associated costs among Australian patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C (GT1 CHC), including both untreated patients and those receiving treatment with first-generation protease inhibitor-based regimens (telaprevir, boceprevir with pegylated interferon and ribavirin). METHODS: Medical records were reviewed for a stratified random sample of GT1 CHC patients first attending two liver clinics between 2011 and 2013 (principal population; PP), supplemented by all GT1 CHC patients attending one transplant clinic in the same period (transplant population; TP). CHC-related MRU and associated costs are reported for the PP by treatment status (treated/not treated) stratified by baseline fibrosis grade; and for the TP for the pre-transplant, year of transplant and post-transplant periods. RESULTS: A total 1,636 patients were screened and 590 patients (36.1%) were included. Comprehensive MRU data were collected for 276 PP patients (F0-1 n = 59, F2 n = 58, F3 n = 53, F4 n = 106; mean follow-up 17.3 months). Thirty-eight (13.8%) were treatment-experienced prior to enrolment; 55 (19.9%) received triple therapy during the study. Data were collected for 112 TP patients (mean follow-up 29.9 months), 33 (29.5%) received a transplant during the study and 51 (45.5%) beforehand. The annual direct medical costs, excluding drug costs, were higher among treated PP vs. untreated PP (AU$: $1,954 vs $1,202); and year of transplant TP vs. pre/post-transplant TP (AU$: pre-transplant $32,407, transplant $155,138, post-transplant $7,358). LIMITATIONS: To aid interpretation of results, note that only patients with GT1 CHC who are actively managed are included, and MRU data were collected specifically from liver outpatient clinics. That said, movement of patients between hospitals is rare, and any uncaptured MRU is expected to be minimal. CONCLUSIONS: CHC-related MRU increases substantially with disease severity. These real-world MRU data for GT1 CHC will be valuable in assessing the impact of new hepatitis C treatments.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16183
DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2016.1227827
ORCID: 
Journal: Journal of Medical Economics
PubMed URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27552282
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Australia
Hepatitis C, Chronic
Genotype 1
Interferon-based triple-therapy
Information systmes -- Utilisation
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

24
checked on Dec 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.