Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16083
Title: Vaginal-sparing ventral buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty for female urethral stricture: A novel modification of surgical technique
Austin Authors: Hoag, Nathan;Gani, Johan ;Chee, Justin 
Affiliation: Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Department of Urology, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Australia
Issue Date: Jul-2016
Date: 2016-07-05
Publication information: Investigative and Clinical Urology 2016; 57(4):289-302
Abstract: PURPOSE: To present a novel modification of surgical technique to treat female urethral stricture (FUS) by a vaginal-sparing ventral buccal mucosal urethroplasty. Recurrent FUS represents an uncommon, though difficult clinical scenario to manage definitively. A variety of surgical techniques have been described to date, yet a lack of consensus on the optimal procedure persists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We present a 51-year-old female with urethral stricture involving the entire urethra. Suspected etiology was iatrogenic from cystoscopy 17 years prior. Since then, the patient had undergone at least 25 formal urethral dilations and periods of self-dilation. In lithotomy position, the urethra was dilated to accommodate forceps, and ventral urethrotomy carried out sharply, exposing a bed of periurethral tissue. Buccal mucosa was harvested, and a ventral inlay technique facilitated by a nasal speculum, was used to place the graft from the proximal urethra/bladder neck to urethral meatus without a vaginal incision. Graft was sutured into place, and urethral Foley catheter inserted. RESULTS: The vaginal-sparing ventral buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty was deemed successful as of last follow-up. Flexible cystoscopy demonstrated patency of the repair at 6 months. At 10 months of follow-up, the patient was voiding well, with no urinary incontinence. No further interventions have been required. CONCLUSIONS: This case describes a novel modification of surgical technique for performing buccal mucosal urethroplasty for FUS. By avoiding incision of the vaginal mucosa, benefits may include reduced: morbidity, urinary incontinence, and wound complications including urethro-vaginal fistula.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16083
DOI: 10.4111/icu.2016.57.4.298
Journal: Investigative and Clinical Urology
PubMed URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27437540
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Buccal mucosa
female
Reconstructive surgical procedures
Urethral stricture
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

16
checked on Nov 14, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.