Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/13403
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKalman, J M-
dc.contributor.authorJones, Elizabeth F-
dc.contributor.authorDoolan, Laurie-
dc.contributor.authorOliver, L E-
dc.contributor.authorPower, JM-
dc.contributor.authorTonkin, Andrew M-
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-16T03:14:50Z
dc.date.available2015-05-16T03:14:50Z
dc.date.issued1995-10-01-
dc.identifier.citationPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology : Pace; 18(10): 1869-75en_US
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/13403en
dc.description.abstractWe assessed the feasibility of low energy endocardial defibrillation in patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter who had failed a trial of pharmacological reversion with amiodarone. Low energy endocardial defibrillation under general anesthesia was attempted in 9 patients, 5 with atrial flutter and 4 with atrial fibrillation (median duration of arrhythmia 3.75 months). Two large surface area endocardial leads were introduced percutaneously and sited in the right atrial appendage and at the right ventricular apex. A cutaneous patch electrode was placed on the left thorax. Biphasic shocks synchronized to the ventricular electrogram were used to terminate atrial arrhythmias. Three electrode configurations were evaluated in the following sequence at each energy level: atrial cathode to ventricular anode; ventricular cathode to atrial anode; atrial cathode to a combined ventricular and cutaneous anode. If endocardial defibrillation failed (0.5-10 J), transthoracic defibrillation using 200 joules followed by 360 joules, if required, was performed. Endocardial defibrillation was successful in all five patients with atrial flutter (0.5 J, 1.0 J, 1.0 J, 4.0 J, and 10.0 J) but in only one patient with atrial fibrillation (10 J). On no occasion did successful defibrillation occur with one configuration when it had failed with an alternate configuration at that particular energy level. Ventricular fibrillation did not occur, and there were no other significant complications. Low energy endocardial defibrillation is feasible in patients with atrial flutter using large surface area electrodes. Although the success rate of atrial defibrillation was low, further work is required, particularly in patients with more recent onset of the arrhythmia and using a right to left electrode configuration.en_US
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherAdulten
dc.subject.otherAgeden
dc.subject.otherAtrial Fibrillation.physiopathology.therapy.ultrasonographyen
dc.subject.otherAtrial Flutter.physiopathology.therapy.ultrasonographyen
dc.subject.otherEchocardiography, Transesophagealen
dc.subject.otherElectric Countershock.adverse effects.methodsen
dc.subject.otherElectrocardiographyen
dc.subject.otherFemaleen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherMaleen
dc.subject.otherMiddle Ageden
dc.subject.otherVentricular Function, Leften
dc.titleLow energy endocardial cardioversion of atrial arrhythmias in humans.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitlePacing and Clinical Electrophysiology : PACEen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationCardiologyen_US
dc.description.pages1869-75en
dc.relation.urlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8539154en
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
local.name.researcherJones, Elizabeth F
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
crisitem.author.deptCardiology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

36
checked on Dec 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.