Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/12093
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAbbott, Jacenta Den
dc.contributor.authorWijeratne, Tissaen
dc.contributor.authorHughes, Andrew Jen
dc.contributor.authorPerre, Dianaen
dc.contributor.authorLindell, Annukka Ken
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-16T01:44:26Z-
dc.date.available2015-05-16T01:44:26Z-
dc.date.issued2014-02-19en
dc.identifier.citationBrain and Cognition 2014; 86(): 42-54en
dc.identifier.govdoc24561822en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/12093en
dc.description.abstractThere remains conflict in the literature about the lateralisation of affective face perception. Some studies have reported a right hemisphere advantage irrespective of valence, whereas others have found a left hemisphere advantage for positive, and a right hemisphere advantage for negative, emotion. Differences in injury aetiology and chronicity, proportion of male participants, participant age, and the number of emotions used within a perception task may contribute to these contradictory findings. The present study therefore controlled and/or directly examined the influence of these possible moderators. Right brain-damaged (RBD; n=17), left brain-damaged (LBD; n=17), and healthy control (HC; n=34) participants completed two face perception tasks (identification and discrimination). No group differences in facial expression perception according to valence were found. Across emotions, the RBD group was less accurate thanthe HC group, however RBD and LBD group performancedid not differ. The lack of difference between RBD and LBD groups indicates that both hemispheres are involved in positive and negative expression perception. The inclusion of older adults and the well-defined chronicity range of the brain-damaged participants may have moderated these findings. Participant sex and general face perception ability did not influence performance. Furthermore, while the RBD group was less accurate than the LBD group when the identification task tested two emotions, performance of the two groups was indistinguishable when the number of emotions increased (four or six). This suggests that task demand moderates a study's ability to find hemispheric differences in the perception of facial emotion.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherEmotionen
dc.subject.otherFacialen
dc.subject.otherLateralisationen
dc.subject.otherPerceptionen
dc.subject.otherStrokeen
dc.subject.otherAdulten
dc.subject.otherAffecten
dc.subject.otherAgeden
dc.subject.otherAged, 80 and overen
dc.subject.otherDiscrimination (Psychology)en
dc.subject.otherFacial Expressionen
dc.subject.otherFemaleen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherMaleen
dc.subject.otherMiddle Ageden
dc.subject.otherStroke.psychologyen
dc.subject.otherVisual Perceptionen
dc.subject.otherYoung Adulten
dc.titleThe perception of positive and negative facial expressions by unilateral stroke patients.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleBrain and cognitionen
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Psychological Science, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationAustin Health, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationWestern Health, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.bandc.2014.01.017en
dc.description.pages42-54en
dc.relation.urlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24561822en
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
local.name.researcherHughes, Andrew J
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.deptNeurology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

38
checked on Nov 12, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.