Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11944
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGodfrey, Gen
dc.contributor.authorHilton, Aen
dc.contributor.authorBellomo, Rinaldoen
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-16T01:34:41Z
dc.date.available2015-05-16T01:34:41Z
dc.date.issued2013-12-01en
dc.identifier.citationCurrent Opinion in Critical Care; 19(6): 624-9en
dc.identifier.govdoc24240829en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11944en
dc.description.abstractDecisions to limit life-sustaining therapy (DLLST) in the ICU are used to uphold patients' autonomy, protect them from non-beneficial treatment and fairly distribute resources. The institution of these decisions is complex, with a variety of qualitative and quantitative data published. This review aims to summarize the main issues and review the contemporary research findings on this subject.DLLST are used in a variety of clinical and non-clinical situations, before and after ICU admission, and are not always part of end-of-life management. There are many dilemmas and barriers that beset their institution. Many ICU physicians feel inadequately trained to carry them out and they are frequently a source of conflict. A variety of strategies have been examined to improve their institution, including advanced directives, intensive communication strategies and family information leaflets, many of which have improved patient and family-centred outcomes.There are a number of uncertainties that beset the institution of DLLST in the ICU; however, a variety of research has improved our ability to understand and implement them. This review frames some of the dilemmas and discusses some of the procedural strategies that have been used to improve outcomes.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherCommunicationen
dc.subject.otherDecision Makingen
dc.subject.otherEuthanasia, Passive.ethics.trendsen
dc.subject.otherFamily.psychologyen
dc.subject.otherFemaleen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherIntensive Care Unitsen
dc.subject.otherLife Support Care.ethics.psychologyen
dc.subject.otherMaleen
dc.subject.otherPersonal Autonomyen
dc.subject.otherProfessional-Family Relationsen
dc.subject.otherTerminal Care.ethics.psychologyen
dc.subject.otherWithholding Treatmenten
dc.titleTo treat or not to treat: withholding treatment in the ICU.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleCurrent opinion in critical careen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Anaesthesia, Hillingdon Hospital, London, UK bDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg cAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Center, Prahran, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/MCC.0000000000000036en
dc.description.pages624-9en
dc.relation.urlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24240829en
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
local.name.researcherBellomo, Rinaldo
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
crisitem.author.deptData Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

44
checked on Jan 13, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.