Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11766
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSuzuki, Satoshien
dc.contributor.authorEastwood, Glenn Men
dc.contributor.authorPeck, Leahen
dc.contributor.authorGlassford, Neil Jen
dc.contributor.authorBellomo, Rinaldoen
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-16T01:23:37Z
dc.date.available2015-05-16T01:23:37Z
dc.date.issued2013-05-15en
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Critical Care 2013; 28(5): 647-54en
dc.identifier.govdoc23683560en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11766en
dc.description.abstractOxygen (O2) is the most common therapy in mechanically ventilated patients, but targets and dose are poorly understood. We aimed to describe current O2 administration and titration in such patients in an academic intensive care unit.In consecutive ventilated (>48 hours) patients we prospectively obtained fraction of inspired O2 (FiO2), pulse oximetry O2 saturation (SpO2) and arterial O2 tension (PaO2) every 6 hours. We calculated the amount of excess O2 delivery and the intensivists' response to hyperoxemia (SpO2>98%).During 358 mechanical ventilation days in 51 critically ill patients, median calculated excess O2 delivery was 3472 L per patient. Patients spent most of their time with their SpO2>98% (59% [29-83]) and PaO2 between 80 and 120 mm Hg (59% [38-72]). In addition, 50% of all observations showed hyperoxemia and 4% severe hyperoxemia (PaO2>202.5 mm Hg). Moreover, 71% of the calculated total excess 263,841 L of O2 was delivered when the Fio2 was 0.3 to 0.5. When hyperoxemia occurred with an Fio2 between 0.3 and 0.4, for 88% of episodes, no Fio2 adjustments were made.Excess O2 delivery and liberal O2 therapy were common in mechanically ventilated patients. Current O2 therapy practice may be suboptimal and further investigations are warranted.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherFraction of inspired oxygenen
dc.subject.otherHyperoxiaen
dc.subject.otherIntensive careen
dc.subject.otherMechanical ventilationen
dc.subject.otherOxygenen
dc.subject.otherAPACHEen
dc.subject.otherAgeden
dc.subject.otherBlood Gas Analysisen
dc.subject.otherCritical Illnessen
dc.subject.otherFemaleen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherIntensive Care Unitsen
dc.subject.otherMaleen
dc.subject.otherMiddle Ageden
dc.subject.otherOximetryen
dc.subject.otherOxygen.administration & dosageen
dc.subject.otherOxygen Inhalation Therapy.methodsen
dc.subject.otherProspective Studiesen
dc.subject.otherRespiration, Artificialen
dc.titleCurrent oxygen management in mechanically ventilated patients: a prospective observational cohort study.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Critical Careen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.03.010en
dc.description.pages647-54en
dc.relation.urlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23683560en
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
local.name.researcherBellomo, Rinaldo
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
crisitem.author.deptData Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

22
checked on Jul 6, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.