Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11306
Title: | Selecting appropriate voxel-based methods for neuroimaging studies. | Austin Authors: | Abbott, David F ;Pell, Gaby S;Pardoe, Heath R;Jackson, Graeme D | Affiliation: | Florey Neuroscience Institutes, Melbourne Brain Centre, Austin Hospital, Victoria, Australia | Issue Date: | 6-Jul-2011 | Publication information: | Neuroimage 2011; 59(2): 885-6 | Abstract: | We highlight a fundamental difference between voxel-based methods that interrogate signal intensity directly and those that interrogate morphometric features; we discuss how signal intensity changes might erroneously affect morphometric measures, and we provide some guidance for selection of appropriate methods to address particular hyphotheses. Our discussion is motivated by a recent application of voxel-based morphometry methods to T2-weighted images (T2-Voxel Based Morphometry; T2-VBM). In this context we discuss alternative approaches including Voxel-Based T2-Relaxometry (VBR) and Voxel Based Iterative Sensitivity analysis of T2-Weighted Images (VBIS-T2). | Gov't Doc #: | 21763436 | URI: | https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11306 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.083 | Journal: | NeuroImage | URL: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21763436 | Type: | Journal Article | Subjects: | Alzheimer Disease.pathology Brain.pathology Female Humans Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted.methods Imaging, Three-Dimensional.methods Magnetic Resonance Imaging.methods Male |
Appears in Collections: | Journal articles |
Show full item record
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.