Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/10383
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLeigh, Bronwyn-
dc.contributor.authorMilgrom, Jeannette-
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-15T23:49:02Z
dc.date.available2015-05-15T23:49:02Z
dc.date.issued2007-03-05-
dc.identifier.citationThe Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing : A Quarterly Publication of the Royal Australian Nursing Federation; 24(3): 14-8en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/10383en
dc.description.abstractThe Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is generally recognised as a valid, reliable, cost-effective and simple tool to implement within routine care, however there is controversy regarding the acceptability of screening for depression. This paper aims to examine how acceptable women find (1) completing a battery of questionnaires, including the EPDS and (2) receiving feedback from midwives regarding the significance of their EPDS score when being screened for depression as part of routine antenatal care.Telephone interviews with women following completion of the questionnaire battery and receiving feedback from midwives.Antenatal primary care in a hospital setting.Community sample of 407 women screened by midwives in antenatal clinics.Information regarding women's experience of participating in the screening process.100% of women reported that the screening experience was acceptable and not upsetting. Almost 50% reported that the screening process raised their awareness of perinatal depression. No woman reported feeling stigmatised, labelled or distressed by the screening process. Women reported that gaining immediate feedback from midwives was reassuring.This study strongly supports the acceptability of routine screening for perinatal depression in the context of registered midwife support.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherAdolescenten
dc.subject.otherAdulten
dc.subject.otherDepression, Postpartum.diagnosis.psychologyen
dc.subject.otherFemaleen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherMass Screening.utilizationen
dc.subject.otherMiddle Ageden
dc.subject.otherPatient Acceptance of Health Careen
dc.subject.otherQueenslanden
dc.subject.otherQuestionnairesen
dc.titleAcceptability of antenatal screening for depression in routine antenatal care.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleThe Australian journal of advanced nursing : a quarterly publication of the Royal Australian Nursing Federationen
dc.identifier.affiliationParent-Infant Research Instituteen
dc.identifier.affiliationClinical and Health Psychologyen
dc.description.pages14-8en
dc.relation.urlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17518160en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4082-4595en
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
local.name.researcherMilgrom, Jeannette
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.deptParent-Infant Research Institute-
crisitem.author.deptClinical and Health Psychology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

46
checked on Jan 15, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.