Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/10218
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGemmill, Alan W-
dc.contributor.authorLeigh, Bronwyn-
dc.contributor.authorEricksen, Jennifer-
dc.contributor.authorMilgrom, Jeannette-
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-15T23:35:54Z
dc.date.available2015-05-15T23:35:54Z
dc.date.issued2006-08-17-
dc.identifier.citationBmc Public Health 2006; 6(): 211en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/10218en
dc.description.abstractInformation on clinical acceptability is needed when making cost-utility decisions about health screening implementation. Despite being in use for two decades, most data on the clinical acceptability of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) come from qualitative reports, or include relatively small samples of depressed women. This study aimed to measure acceptability in a survey of a relatively large, community sample with a high representation of clinically depressed women.Using mail, telephone and face-to-face interview, 920 postnatal women were approached to take part in a survey on the acceptability of the EPDS, including 601 women who had screened positive for depression and 245 who had received DSM-IV diagnoses of depression. Acceptability was measured on a 5-point Likert scale of comfort ranging from "Not Comfortable", through "Comfortable" to "Very Comfortable".The response rate was just over half for postal surveys (52%) and was 100% for telephone and face-to-face surveys (432, 21 and 26 respondents for postal, telephone and face-to-face surveys respectively) making 479 respondents in total. Of these, 81.2% indicated that screening with the EPDS had been in the range of "Comfortable" to "Very Comfortable". The other 18.8 % rated screening below the "Comfortable" point, including a small fraction (4.3%) who rated answering questions on the EPDS as "Not Comfortable" at the extreme end of the scale. Comfort was inversely related to EPDS score, but the absolute size of this effect was small. Almost all respondents (97%) felt that screening was desirable.The EPDS had good acceptability in this study for depressed and non-depressed women. Women's views on the desirability of postnatal depression screening appear to be largely independent of personal level of comfort with screening. These results should be useful to policy-makers and are broadly supportive of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale as a suitable tool for universal perinatal depression screening.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherAdulten
dc.subject.otherCost-Benefit Analysisen
dc.subject.otherDepression, Postpartum.diagnosis.psychologyen
dc.subject.otherDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disordersen
dc.subject.otherFemaleen
dc.subject.otherHealth Care Surveys.methodsen
dc.subject.otherHealth Plan Implementationen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherInterviews as Topicen
dc.subject.otherMass Screening.economics.psychology.utilizationen
dc.subject.otherNeeds Assessmenten
dc.subject.otherPatient Acceptance of Health Care.psychologyen
dc.subject.otherPsychiatric Status Rating Scalesen
dc.subject.otherResidence Characteristicsen
dc.subject.otherScotlanden
dc.titleA survey of the clinical acceptability of screening for postnatal depression in depressed and non-depressed women.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleBMC public healthen
dc.identifier.affiliationParent-Infant Research Instituteen
dc.identifier.affiliationClinical and Health Psychologyen
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2458-6-211en
dc.description.pages211en
dc.relation.urlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16914061en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4082-4595en
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
local.name.researcherEricksen, Jennifer
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptParent-Infant Research Institute-
crisitem.author.deptParent-Infant Research Institute-
crisitem.author.deptParent-Infant Research Institute-
crisitem.author.deptClinical and Health Psychology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
16914061.pdf257.84 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

64
checked on Dec 27, 2024

Download(s)

104
checked on Dec 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.